| curiosoperoinutil.com https://curiosoperoinutil.com/forum/ |
|
| pregunta 250: unos versos (por delegación de x- pacer) https://curiosoperoinutil.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1708 |
Página 1 de 1 |
| Autor: | andreito [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 22:37 ] |
| Asunto: | pregunta 250: unos versos (por delegación de x- pacer) |
| Autor: | elviruca [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:22 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | andreito [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:36 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | Adama [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:39 ] |
| Asunto: | Re: pregunta 250: unos versos (por delegación de x- pacer) |
| Autor: | elviruca [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:41 ] |
| Asunto: | |
Es una charla de Stephen Hawking (pertenece a su página), pero el autor en castellano es Astroseti.org Edito: no es la respuesta correcta???? REedito: Corrigiendo posibles fallos (cansanda de quesitos morales) Hasta mañana |
|
| Autor: | De Molay [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:49 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | andreito [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:52 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | andreito [ Vie 27 Oct 2006, 23:58 ] |
| Asunto: | |
acabo de ver la reedición de elviruca y ....... por fín REDOBLE DE TAMBORES QUESIIIIIIITO PARA EEEEEELVIIIIIIRUUUUUUCA ![$m[1]](http://personales.ya.com/remocpi/queso-cpi-m.gif)
y bien que me alegro por ti. por cierto, los versos de la pregunta aparecen en el libro de hawking brevísima historia del tiempo. supongo que en la versión original en inglés sería algo completamente distinto y que cada traductor los ha puesto de la manera que le ha parecido para que tuviese rima en castellano. intentaré encontrar los versos en inglés a ver que dicen. |
|
| Autor: | Adama [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 00:00 ] |
| Asunto: | |
Elviruca!!! 
Como se nota que es una Bethe... 
|
|
| Autor: | Klaatu [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 00:17 ] |
| Asunto: | |
Pues no es por nada, pero los versos son muy utilizados. Martin Gardner hace referencia a ellos en varios libros suyos de, por lo menos, los años 60. Y con varias versiones distintas. |
|
| Autor: | elviruca [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 02:11 ] |
| Asunto: | |
Acabo de llegar y lo he mirado, por fin!!! Klaatu, no te me enfades. Intentaré pensar una pregunta para mañana, no os digo la hora, pero no será temprano (los sábados se respetan) |
|
| Autor: | Klaatu [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 02:37 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | astrocitoma [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 04:07 ] |
| Asunto: | |
Maldito insomnio... por cierto libro genial: Chapter 10: ( A brief history of Time ) Wormholes and time travel (...) Because there is no unique standard of time, but rather observers each have their own time as measured by clocks that they carry with them, it is possible for the journey to seem to be much shorter for the space travelers than for those who remain on earth. But there would not be much joy in returning from a space voyage a few years older to find that everyone you had left behind was dead and gone thousands of years ago. So in order to have any human interest in their stories, science fiction writers had to suppose that we would one day discover how to travel faster than light. What most of thee authors don’t seem to have realized is that if you can travel faster than light, the theory of relativity implies you can also travel back in the, as the following limerick says: There was a young lady of Wight Who traveled much faster than light. She departed one day, In a relative way, And arrived on the previous night. The point is that the theory of relativity says hat there is no unique measure of time that all observers will agree on Rather, each observer has his or her own measure of time. If it is possible for a rocket traveling below the speed of light to get from event A (say, the final of the 100-meter race of the Olympic Games in 202) to event B (say, the opening of the 100,004th meeting of the Congress of Alpha Centauri), then all observers will agree that event A happened before event B according to their times. Suppose, however, that the spaceship would have to travel faster than light to carry the news of the race to the Congress. Then observers moving at different speeds can disagree about whether event A occurred before B or vice versa. According to the time of an observer who is at rest with respect to the earth, it may be that the Congress opened after the race. Thus this observer would think that a spaceship could get from A to B in time if only it could ignore the speed-of-light speed limit. However, to an observer at Alpha Centauri moving away from the earth at nearly the speed of light, it would appear that event B, the opening of the Congress, would occur before event A, the 100-meter race. The theory of relativity says that the laws of physics appear the same to observers moving at different speeds. (...) |
|
| Autor: | elviruca [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 12:39 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | Adama [ Sab 28 Oct 2006, 13:09 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Autor: | astrocitoma [ Mar 07 Nov 2006, 00:26 ] |
| Asunto: | |
| Página 1 de 1 | Todos los horarios son UTC + 1 hora [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|